The majority is consulting with the political parties that are
represented in Parliament, after the decision of the Constitutional
Court about the government’s Normative Act for the Civil Employee Law.
Milena Harito, Minister of Innovation and Public Administration, together with the Minister for Relations with the Parliament, Ilir Celibashi, held a meeting that lasted more than 60 minutes at the Parliament’s Headquarters. Harito declared that the consequences of the Constitutional Court decision are very important, and that they want to discuss them with all political parties, especially the opposition.
“Mr.Vasili and Mr.Idrizi were present toda from the opposition. Paloka and Mediu did not arrive. The Court’s decision repeals the Normative Act, but it keeps being in function from the memont it is published on the official bulletin. This is the court’s decision and there is no problem about this.
Top Channel: What’s your proposition, facing this situation?
Harito: We will propose law amends, to be in coherence with what we had decided. Postponing the effects, because we had reasons to do that. The Constitutional Court has not taken a decision on this. They have decided over the intervention of the Nnormative Act, but not over the fact that makes us postpone the effects. We think that it is necessary to postpone the effects until April 1st, and we will do this by changing some laws. For this reason we invited the opposition to be part of this.
“The sub-legal acts, they are all over. Two of them will pass very soon for a verdict at the Counsil of Ministers, and the rest will be on the days to come”/
DP: Court’s decision is not discussed
The Democratic Party declared that there are two major reasons why they didn’t answer to the invitation of two government members to discuss the Constitutional Court’s decision, which rejected the Normative Act as abnti-constitutional, and postponed until April the day when the new law for the Civil Empoyee enters in effect.
The first reason, according to the opposition, was that a Parliamentary republic cannot have the government summoning the Parliament. And secondly, in a Republic where the Constitutional Court is the supreme institution, no one can discuss their decisions but only implement them.
“We cannot be part of any Commission without consensus. We cannot sign new agreements with the Socialist Party, without implementing the first ones. If they aim to do what cannot be done, let’s undertake this initiative and take it to the end, only as a majority. It will certainly have its consequences. It hasn’t happened and it will never happen having these decisions being taken by only one party”, Paloka declared.
When asked if the Democratic Party would be part of the Commission for the Administrative Reform, since the majority accepted the request for the Investigative Commission for the appointments at the State Police, the Parliament leader declared that this is not an act of consensus from the government, since it took place after the opposition made the majority accept it.
Top Channel
