Magistrates: President dismisses Parliament

President Nishani ranks five reasons for the return of these changes. First, it is stated in the notice issued by the Presidency, is that MPs themselves have proposed changes to the law on the functioning of the School of Magistrate which is identified as a serious and efficient institution in the initial and continuous training of magistrates.”

Nishani says that the changes disrupt the equilibrium of the Governing Council of the school, while changes under Article 17 to establish a commission doctor-psychiatrist and psychologist for recruitment of magistrates for granting permission to practice the ability of a judge or prosecutor are anti-constitutional.

Fourth, the Presidency said that the criteria set for Elections of the director of this school are exaggerated, exceptional and extremely discriminatory and finally assessed as transitional, infringing the principle of legal certainty and thus the constitutional principle of the rule of law.

But immediately after this president’s decree, the majority has given the first signal that it intends to withdraw from its positions on judicial reform. Edi Rama, the Prime Minister warned that in social networking sites:
“Regrets for the President who between inertia of justice collapse and radical reform has chosen inertia”, writes Rama.

The opposition, on the other hand, has come out in support of the President’s decision, which qualifies constitutional attitude toward what it calls illegal seizures of ASM.

“Constitutional Return from the President’s illegal catch of the trio: Rama-Meta-Crime in the Assembly. Justice Reform requires inclusion, constitutional rationality and transparency, not grafted oligarchs with crime, who do not want to reform justice,” wrote in his official profile on Facebook, head of the Democratic Party, Basha.

Top Channel