The Court of Serious Crimes say it is not necessary to establish a
special anti-corruption court as long as current laws also leave it as
their competence.
Judges consider the provisions of the draft-amend as confusing, and ask of what will happen with the cases that are currently ongoing in court.
Judges asked the Justice Minister if it is possible to not change the name and continue the cases with the same Court, but the Minister answered that this can be completed by starting with the Court of Serious Crimes.
The President of the Court of Appeal for Serious Crimes said that the judge panel in these courts must not change, but to be treated with a priority. The President of the Serious Crimes reminded that judges are demoralized, especially with big cases in their hands.
But the Minister of Justice says that the problem lies elsewhere. He reminded them of the suspended trials against judges accused of hidng assets. “We don’t expect anyone to check judges how many times they have traveled. We can use the positive jurisprudence enclave that has been created so far to destroy the influence of corporatization in the judiciary system”, Manjani said.
Top Channel
